T71 has worse gun depression and easily HE-able armor by anything. Chi Ri actually only has vulnerable sides (to most high caliber weapons excluding derps like the KV-2 and SU 152) and it (should) edge out the T71 in the gun handling department (and DPM as well). This feature is not available right now. Please try again later. Summary conclusion on the T71 CMCD. American lightweight premium tank T71 CMCD boast nothing special is not even the appearance of the tank compared to the T92 light tank is inferior in general. Will be sold or issued for new LBZ 2.0 in World of Tanks is not yet known, we can only wait for official information from the site. AMX 13 75 & T71 buff. While it could use more alpha in that clip I quite liked playing it at the end and really saw a huge change from 700-900 dmg to. AMX 13 75 & T71 buff - posted in General Discussion: Theartythief, on 03 January 2018 - 05:38 PM, said: T71 needs a mobility and penetration buff Shrugs. I had no problem with that tank. Rather than say mobility you probably mean acceleration? The tank was mobile, small and effective. US tanks are not known for being fast off the starting line.
(Redirected from T71 (tank))
The T71 Experimental Airborne Light Tank was part of a 1952 plan by the US to replace the M41 Walker Bulldog in service. It was equipped with a primary oscillating turret. It was similar to the AMX-13 and the T92 Light Tank. By 1953, there were 3 designs that were suggested as a replacement. Those 3 designs were drawn by Detroit Arsenal, Cadillac, and Aircraft Armaments.
History[edit]T71 Cmcd Wot Equipment
In 1952, the Army Ordnance Committee gave general required characteristics for a replacement of the M41 Walker Bulldog. Originally, there was a 20 ton maximum weight and a requirement for a 90 mm gun. This requirement was later changed to an 18-ton weight limit and a 76 millimeter gun which would have allowed a quicker replacement of the barrel.[citation needed]
Design[edit]
It had an oscillating turret and a second turret mounted on the previous turret; the first turret had the primary armament of a 76mm M1A2 or a 76mm T185; the second 'mini turret' had a secondary armament of an American GPMG. Separated suspension wheels made it easier to cross difficult terrain. It was proposed to serve as an armed reconnaissance vehicle, only aided in its endeavours by the tank's light weight and therefore faster speeds.
Main armament[edit]
The T71 had a choice between two guns, the 76mm M1A2 or a 76mm T185. Both guns used an auto-loading system, which benefit from light-weighted, low-profile, high burst damage, and fewer crew members. However, that meant that the commander and the gunner would have had to manually load the magazine after the burst, leaving the vehicle very vulnerable while reloading. The relatively small caliber of the gun also was rather ineffective against thick armor, such as the Russian heavy tank series 'IS'.
T71 WotReferences[edit]![]()
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T71_Light_Tank&oldid=913790437'
T71 Wot 900 Dmg Download
ok so im grinding thru the 7 & its a lot more bearable with the upgrade engine & turret.
im using the top gun because hit power & penn, but also because it & the second one down both have poor depression so why not go with the penn & hit-power.
anyways, now that im getting to like the horribly slow thing, my question is : how does the premium 'Bulldog' Churchill 7 compare to the tech tree ?
from what i can tell its a second gun package down Churchill 7 with a slight boost to RoF & hull traverse.
it also lacks the front covers to the tracks.
so after having a good time in the Church 7, the Bulldog with its PMM & better RoF actually seems attractive. because all i could see when it first came out was '20 km/h - BORING!'
Edited by Wroclaw, 10 August 2017 - 11:25 AM.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2020
Categories |